World History. The Mandate for Palestine is an historical League of Essay

World History. The Mandate for Palestine is an historical League of Nations - Essay ExampleIt should be noted that the Mandate for Palestine was carried on by the joined Nations after the League of Nations was dissolved. The precursor for the Mandate for Palestine was the speech by President Woodrow Wilson in January 8 1918. The speech on the fourteen stations clearly depict the issues that needed to be handled so that the war could end. The fifth point in Woodrows speech states that A free, open psycheed and absolutely impartial readjustment of all colonial claims, based upon a strict observance of the principle that in determining all such questions of s overeignty the interests of the populations concerned must make up equal weight with the equitable claims of the government whose title is to be determined (Woodrow, 1) This was meant to ensure that all colonial claims were sorted out and each country apt(p) its sovereignty. President Woodrow believed that all the people in t he world were partners of interest and justice had to be done to all. He believed that world peace could wholly be win if the colonial claims were to be settled in a conclusive and impartial manner. In my opinion, the articles of the Mandate of Palestine did not effectively meet the fifth point of Woodrow Wilson Fourteen Points. A critical evaluation of the Mandate of Palestine indicates that the interests of Israel were given a higher priority than those of the Palestine people. Woodrows fifth point states that the assembly line of colonial boundaries was to be done in a free, open minded and impartial manner. Yet, Article 2 of the Mandate for Palestine states that The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will desexualise the establishment of the Jewish national home. This implies that the establishment of the Jewish distinguish was to be given a high priority. It would have been appropriate for the Mandate of Palestine to begin with an objective evaluating the Middle East issue with an open mind without having any bias towards the settling of the Israelites (Michale, 104). Also, the entire list of articles that make up the Mandate for Palestine does not mention the name Arab. This is a remarkable level of bias given the fact that the Arabs were already occupying parts of Palestine. The Mandate hence fell short of the impartiality threshold of recognizing all the affected parties in the strife as equals. Essentially, the Mandate considered the Arab interests as secondary to those of the Jews. Woodrows fifth point envisioned that all the interests of the populations had to have equal weight and equitable claims of the government in question. Yet, it is apparent that the Arabs were given a raw deal. The twelfth point of Woodrow Wilson Fourteen Points states that The Turkish portions of the present Ottoman Empire should be assured a secure sovereignty, but the other national ities which are now under Turkish rule should be assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity of an sovereign development, and the Dardanelles should be permanently opened as a free passage to the ships and commerce of all nations under international guarantees. Woodrow envisioned that the Ottoman Empire which the Turks presided over should be split and administrative units formed according to the will of the people. In essence, it was clear that the different peoples of the Ottoman Empire had a right to self-determination which would only be guaranteed by giving them freedom. Although the Ottoman Empire was eventually split, the twelfth point was never achieved full. The main beneficiaries of the breakup of the Ottoman Em